On Mon, January 10, 2011 12:03, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 19:18:37 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Thanks. Please go ahead.
>
> Uploaded.
Marked for accept at the next dinstall; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 19:18:37 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:31 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 18:43:20 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > fwiw, most of the changes in -6 don't actually appear to be needed; the
>> > problem only arises when t
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:31 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 18:43:20 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > fwiw, most of the changes in -6 don't actually appear to be needed; the
> > problem only arises when the tests of the form "[ -z $VAR1 -o -z
> > $VAR2 ]" are used (and spe
Hi all,
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 21:53:07 (CET), Chris Wilson wrote:
> Reinhard, I'm going to add this fix to 0.11 to make 0.11.1, would you
> like to update the Debian packages when it becomes available shortly?
Thanks for the offer, but I don't think a new upstream release will be
necessary. Bt
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 13:55 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> To avoid further confusion. You are not talking about #601882 (which is
> about a minor documentation issue), but about #601506, which has been
> fixed in sid and squeeze, but is still unfixed in lenny. I'm updating
> the bugs' version in
tags 601506 lenny
found 601506 0.11~rc2-5
stop
[ Adding debian-release@lists.debian.org for SRM's input ]
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 11:58:18 (CET), JP Vossen wrote:
> This is not a "minor" bug, it's a show-stopper that prevents the package
> from working.
To avoid further confusion. You are not
6 matches
Mail list logo
