On 16 October 2010 at 13:48, Julien Cristau wrote:
| On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 06:46:19 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > Darn. But there is nothing I can do here. I made six or seven pre-releases
| > of R 2.12 to experimental in the meantime and left unstable alone.
| >
| > But now R 2.12 ca
On 16 October 2010 at 11:12, Julien Cristau wrote:
| On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 00:20:00 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
|
| > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 16:12:28 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > > r-base 2.11.1-7 seems to have been built everywhere now. I would kindly
ask
| > > you to unblock i
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 06:46:19 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Darn. But there is nothing I can do here. I made six or seven pre-releases
> of R 2.12 to experimental in the meantime and left unstable alone.
>
> But now R 2.12 came out (on schedule as always) on Oct 15 and I owe that to
> my
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 00:20:00 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 16:12:28 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> > r-base 2.11.1-7 seems to have been built everywhere now. I would kindly ask
> > you to unblock it for 'squeeze'. The package is unchanged from 2.11.1-6
> > wit
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 16:12:28 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> r-base 2.11.1-7 seems to have been built everywhere now. I would kindly ask
> you to unblock it for 'squeeze'. The package is unchanged from 2.11.1-6 with
> the sole difference the addition of libzma-dev to the Build-Depends, an
Dear Release Team,,
On 4 October 2010 at 22:44, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
| Package: r-base-core
| Version: 2.11.1-6
| Severity: important
| Tags: security
|
| r-base-core contains an embedded version of liblzma, which makes
| security updates a headache.
|
| It seems to already contain code for lin
6 matches
Mail list logo
