On 10/13/2010 06:26 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> That's not the sad part. The sad part is that there many things to
> cherry pick and the maintainer doesn't seem to care because he is too
> busy re-packaging and he was taking Squeeze's users as hostages and didn't
> want to fix that tty-related bug.
On 10/13/2010 06:27 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> The funny thing is that patch was the first commit after "0.8.3"
>> tag in upstream's Git repository.
>
> the sad thing is, lacking a 0.8.4 release which is long overdue,
> there are many more thing
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> The funny thing is that patch was the first commit after "0.8.3" tag in
> upstream's Git repository.
the sad thing is, lacking a 0.8.4 release which is long overdue, there
are many more things to cherry pick, check the ubuntu package.
--
Address:
On 10/13/2010 06:09 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> That one is fixed for me with -9.1, which I uploaded to tpu. I'll try
>> to go through the changes between -9 and -16 later to see what else
>> should be backported.
thanks, uploaded -17 to unstable with your fix.
>> Hopefully that'll resolve your c
On 10/13/2010 06:06 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> That one is fixed for me with -9.1, which I uploaded to tpu. I'll try
> to go through the changes between -9 and -16 later to see what else
> should be backported.
>
> Hopefully that'll resolve your concern and we can keep plymouth in
> squeeze, a
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 14:37:25 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 11:13 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Why?
>
> see previous mail, there were other fixes, i don't want to backport them
> and in will not suport, if at all (see below), anything before -14 in an
> upcoming sta
On 10/07/2010 03:14 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Why did you let it enter testing in the first place then?
because the unfixed bugs were not known by then? because the fixed bugs
were supposed to be closed by letting -15 migrate?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Bibe
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 14:37:25 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> and in will not suport, if at all (see below), anything before -14 in an
> upcoming stable release.
>
Why did you let it enter testing in the first place then?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 10/07/2010 11:13 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Why?
see previous mail, there were other fixes, i don't want to backport them
and in will not suport, if at all (see below), anything before -14 in an
upcoming stable release.
unrelated to that, plymouth has still some unfixed open issues (most
prom
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 07:55:50 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> retitle 599058 remove plymouth from testing
> thanks
>
> On 10/07/2010 01:04 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I don't think it's worth it at this point. If you want a splash screen
> > you probably have X installed anyway, so plymouth
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 07:55:50AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> retitle 599058 remove plymouth from testing
> thanks
>
> On 10/07/2010 01:04 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I don't think it's worth it at this point. If you want a splash screen
> > you probably have X installed anyway, so plymouth
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 599058 remove plymouth from testing
Bug #599058 [release.debian.org] permission to upload plymouth/0.8.3-14 to
unstable.
Changed Bug title to 'remove plymouth from testing' from 'permission to upload
plymouth/0.8.3-14 to unstable.'
> tha
retitle 599058 remove plymouth from testing
thanks
On 10/07/2010 01:04 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I don't think it's worth it at this point. If you want a splash screen
> you probably have X installed anyway, so plymouth pulling in libdrm
> isn't really an issue IMO.
then please remove plymouth
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:52:57 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
>
> i've improved plymouth packaging so that when you want to use the ascii
> splash it doesn't pull in any other depends (apart from
> libc/initramfs-tools). before, it pulled in all of libdrm and additio
Package: release.debian.org
i've improved plymouth packaging so that when you want to use the ascii
splash it doesn't pull in any other depends (apart from
libc/initramfs-tools). before, it pulled in all of libdrm and additional
xorg stuff.
attached is a diff that shows the changes for above thin
15 matches
Mail list logo
