Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:07:25 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > - genesis, but ftbfs (#549800) patch sent to the bug. > Remaining blocker bugs are gnudatalanguage, which is not in testing, and has a trivial fix. > minc, which has no reverse dependencies so could be removed if it > doesn't get

Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, May 17, 2010 11:07, Julien Cristau wrote: > block 579524 with 549800 > kthxbye > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:18:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > >> Please schedule the following binNMUs: >> > list was apparently missing > - genesis, but ftbfs (#549800) This may well be easily

Processed: Re: Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 579524 with 549800 Bug #579524 [release.debian.org] transition: libnetcdf4 -> libnetcdf6 Was blocked by: 545849 543018 581801 581296 Added blocking bug(s) of 579524: 549800 > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-17 Thread Julien Cristau
block 579524 with 549800 kthxbye On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:18:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > Please schedule the following binNMUs: > list was apparently missing - genesis, but ftbfs (#549800) - mapserver on armel ia64 mips powerpc Remaining blocker bugs are gnudatalanguage, whic

Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 17:52 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 10:43 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Unfortunately a couple of the binNMUs also FTBFS: > > > > > > > nmu kst_1.7.0-1 . ALL . -m "Reb

Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-16 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 10:43 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Unfortunately a couple of the binNMUs also FTBFS: > > > > > nmu kst_1.7.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against netcdf 4.1.1" > > #543018 > > > > > nmu minc_2.0.18-1 . ALL .

Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 10:43 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Unfortunately a couple of the binNMUs also FTBFS: > > > nmu kst_1.7.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against netcdf 4.1.1" #543018 > > > nmu minc_2.0.18-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against netcdf 4.1.1" #581296 Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 02:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:18:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > Please schedule the following binNMUs: [...] > > nmu v-sim_3.5.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against netcdf 4.1.1" > > nmu dx_1:4.4.4-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against ne

Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 02:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:18:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > Please schedule the following binNMUs: > > No need for dep waits anymore, netcdf is built everywhere. For the > rest: [...] > > nmu gerris_20091109-dfsg.1-1 .

Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-05-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:18:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > Please schedule the following binNMUs: No need for dep waits anymore, netcdf is built everywhere. For the rest: > nmu vtk_5.4.2-6 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against netcdf 4.1.1" doesn't seem to have a dependency on libnetcdf4

Bug#579524: nmu: netcdf4 related

2010-04-28 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule the following binNMUs: nmu v-sim_3.5.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against netcdf 4.1.1" dw v-sim_3.5.1-1 . ALL . -m