Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 05/04/10 at 17:39 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
[ruby1.9 and r-deps]
>> Do you still want to get all of these packages removed?
> Yes please.
Removal hint added.
Marc
--
BOFH #347:
The rubber band broke
pgp5uMUO9Lelt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 05/04/10 at 17:39 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> > I initially planned to track the ruby1.9 -> ruby1.9.1 transition. But I
> > give up. I think that ruby1.9 should be removed from testing now,
> > together with the following list of packages (which are all the r
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> I initially planned to track the ruby1.9 -> ruby1.9.1 transition. But I
> give up. I think that ruby1.9 should be removed from testing now,
> together with the following list of packages (which are all the reverse
> build-deps or depends of ruby1.9):
I ended up with the f
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:19:19PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Roberto C. Sanchez
>libi18n-ruby (U)
>
So, this package does not depend on ruby1.9 any longer. It seems as
though an NMU [0] closed #569875. However, that closure note in the
changelog never carried through to the bug. (
Hi,
I initially planned to track the ruby1.9 -> ruby1.9.1 transition. But I
give up. I think that ruby1.9 should be removed from testing now,
together with the following list of packages (which are all the reverse
build-deps or depends of ruby1.9):
Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
libgruff-rub
clone 573272 -1
reassign -1 src:ruby1.9 1.9.0.5-1
retitle -1 ruby1.9: must go away before squeeze
severity -1 serious
thanks
This package should not be released with Debian squeeze. A transition is
underway to migrate all reverse dependencies.
On 20/03/10 at 13:54 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 573272 -1
Bug#573272: transition: ruby1.9 -> ruby1.9.1
Bug 573272 cloned as bug 574941.
> reassign -1 src:ruby1.9 1.9.0.5-1
Bug #574941 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby1.9 -> ruby1.9.1
Bug reassigned from package 'r
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> What needs to happen is:
> - remove the ruby1.9 source package from testing.
> - make sure all the library packages have been transitioned and migrated
> to testing.
This has not happened yet. I think you should file an explicit rc bug
against ruby1.9 indicating that it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
In squeeze, we plan to ship two ruby versions:
- 1.8(.7.249): current stable branch, used by most packages/applications
- 1.9.1: development branch, already declared stable by upstre
9 matches
Mail list logo
