Re: Bug#570594: Haskell binNMUs

2010-02-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Samstag, den 20.02.2010, 11:19 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > > Such a change is expected to happen very rarely, but we want to be > > prepared. Therefore, from ghc6-6.12.1-10 on, ghc6 also provides virtual > > packages corresponding to the ABIs contained in them. We need all > > h

Re: Bug#570594: Haskell binNMUs

2010-02-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Samstag, den 20.02.2010, 11:23 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > Joachim Breitner writes: > > nmu ghc6_6.12.1-9 . i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m 'Rebuild with > > ghc6-6.12.1-10' > > dw ghc6_6.12.1-9 . amd64 hppa i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc > > kfreebsd-amd64 kfree

Bug#570594: Haskell binNMUs

2010-02-20 Thread Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
Hallo Joachim. Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sex Fev 19 22:17:34 -0200 2010: (...) > nmu ghc6_6.12.1-9 . i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m 'Rebuild with > ghc6-6.12.1-10' Is this correct? Do you want to nmu ghc6_6.12.1-9 to build it with ghc6_6.12.1-10? Greetings. -- marco

Re: Bug#570594: Haskell binNMUs

2010-02-20 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Joachim Breitner writes: > nmu ghc6_6.12.1-9 . i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m 'Rebuild with > ghc6-6.12.1-10' > dw ghc6_6.12.1-9 . amd64 hppa i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc > kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m 'ghc6 (>= 6.12.1-10)' This *so* does not make sense. Killed those again

Bug#570594: Haskell binNMUs

2010-02-19 Thread Joachim Breitner
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Release Team, for Haskell libraries we now have a system of provides and depends in place that guarantees that an ABI change in one of the packages makes broken reverse dependencies uninstallable, simil