Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 568141
Bug #568141 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org]
release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
> reassign 568141 www.debian.org
Bug #568141 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Latest point release
reopen 568141
reassign 568141 www.debian.org
retitle 568141 Syncing of version numbers after point release should be more
explicit
Hello Luk,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 05:42:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 05:13 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200,
On 05/14/2011 05:13 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Luk,
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
This is still about the fact that you're expecting al
Hello Luk,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org
> >> resources to be in sync at point re
On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Julien,
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org
>> resources to be in sync at point release time. I don't think that's
>> reasonable, the release p
Hello Julien,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org
> resources to be in sync at point release time. I don't think that's
> reasonable, the release process is complicated enough as it is. Please
> don't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 568141
Bug #568141 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org]
release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
568141: http://bugs.debia
reopen 568141
thanks
Hello Julien,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 01:31:16AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 19:15:01 +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>
> > Recently a point release was shipped (being installed as I type). At
> > the time of releasing (i.e. when apt saw it) no notic
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:04:20PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> I'm not detailed in the process (thanks for the explanation) and I
> just made a suggestion in my intial mail about a possible improvement.
> So if this unfortunate incident happend because of one time glitches,
> no problem, but t
Hello Philipp,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 08:24:23PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Obviously different from previous updates this page is out of date. I
> > was almost considering stopping the update when I checked
> > http://package
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Obviously different from previous updates this page is out of date. I
> was almost considering stopping the update when I checked
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/XXX instead (how am I to know that this
> page is correct???).
What
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Recently a point release was shipped (being installed as I type). At
the time of releasing (i.e. when apt saw it) no notice was available
on www.debian.org to verify what was upgraded and the version.
Now the News is up (News/2010/20100130.wml) and
12 matches
Mail list logo