Re: Bug#567811: closed by Matt Kraai (Bug#567811: fixed in python-support 1.0.6.1)

2010-02-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 17:07 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 24 février 2010 à 15:55 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > > > Do the SRMs think it is worth a stable update? > > > > Yes. > > > > I'm assuming the diff would be as simple as that for Matt's NMU? > > Yes, it would be almos

Re: Bug#567811: closed by Matt Kraai (Bug#567811: fixed in python-support 1.0.6.1)

2010-02-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 24 février 2010 à 15:55 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > > Do the SRMs think it is worth a stable update? > > Yes. > > I'm assuming the diff would be as simple as that for Matt's NMU? Yes, it would be almost the same. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I rec

Re: Bug#567811: closed by Matt Kraai (Bug#567811: fixed in python-support 1.0.6.1)

2010-02-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Josselin Mouette wrote, Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:19:23 +0100: Le mardi 23 février 2010 à 18:48 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit : > found 567811 0.8.4lenny1 > thanks > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 04:18:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System > wrote: > > update-python-modules does not reset umask while gene

Re: Bug#567811: closed by Matt Kraai (Bug#567811: fixed in python-support 1.0.6.1)

2010-02-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 23 février 2010 à 18:48 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit : > found 567811 0.8.4lenny1 > thanks > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 04:18:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > update-python-modules does not reset umask while generating the contents > > of /usr/lib/pymodules. > > Lenny is