Re: Bug#558412: binutils-dev: Please provide libbfd_pic.a

2010-01-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:57:51 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross > > posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if > > others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is

Re: Bug#558412: binutils-dev: Please provide libbfd_pic.a

2010-01-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:57:51AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross > > posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if > > others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is

Re: Bug#558412: binutils-dev: Please provide libbfd_pic.a

2010-01-14 Thread Luk Claes
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross > posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if > others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is > acceptable and/or viable. Unless it's an option to include opro

Re: Bug#558412: binutils-dev: Please provide libbfd_pic.a

2010-01-14 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is acceptable and/or viable. Regards, -Roberto Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Matthias Klose wrote: >