retitle 554447 RM: electricsheep/2.6.8-9
tags 554447 - moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 15:53 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> Hi. My apologies for not responding earlier. I think that removal from
> Lenny is the best thing, for two reasons:
>
> 1. The new electricsheep package depends
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 554447 RM: electricsheep/2.6.8-9
Bug #554447 [release.debian.org] "electricsheep broken for new installations on
lenny"
Changed Bug title to 'RM: electricsheep/2.6.8-9' from '"electricsheep broken
for new installations on lenny"'
> tags
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 01:59:42PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Dienstag, 17. November 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I've just had a look through the bug log for #533652 (from which this
> > bug against release.debian.org was cloned) and it's unclear to me
> > whether this is a
Hi Adam,
On Dienstag, 17. November 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I've just had a look through the bug log for #533652 (from which this
> bug against release.debian.org was cloned) and it's unclear to me
> whether this is a request to remove the current package from Lenny or
> update it;
Well, i
Hi,
I've just had a look through the bug log for #533652 (from which this
bug against release.debian.org was cloned) and it's unclear to me
whether this is a request to remove the current package from Lenny or
update it; if the latter, please provide a debdiff against the current
Lenny package for
5 matches
Mail list logo
