Matthias Klose wrote:
> The point of reassigning the report to an unknown package is to ask,
> if it's time to drop m68k from the release architectures or just set
> the severity of all m68k reports to wishlist. There's currently nobody
> interested in forwarding m68k related bug reports upstream a
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:28:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on
> another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So
> why not file it for libc6?
What cpu type is that other machine? I assume that ska is a 040?
reassign 327780 m68k
thanks
that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on
another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So
why not file it for libc6?
The point of reassigning the report to an unknown package is to ask,
if it's time to drop m68k from the re
3 matches
Mail list logo
