On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:56:28PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1308 +0200]:
> > I don't think this is RC; you're welcome to sort out what you
> > believe to be the correct solution, and upload -- and if there's
> > time, we can consider
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1308 +0200]:
> I don't think this is RC; you're welcome to sort out what you
> believe to be the correct solution, and upload -- and if there's
> time, we can consider it.
I will rather spend my time on other RC things then.
Can we includ
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:18:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1110 +0200]:
> > Does the package fail to install in this case? That's perfectly reasonable
> > behavior if the user is ignoring critical questions from debconf. The
> > s
* Steve Langasek
> Does the package fail to install in this case? That's perfectly
> reasonable behavior if the user is ignoring critical questions from
> debconf. The solution for such cases is for the user to either
> preseed the debconf cache, or not expect non-interactive installs to
> work.
also sprach Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1209 +0200]:
> With regard to this particular bug, I think the default should be not
> to create an instance like Martin suggested yesterday. Why a package
> like Zope /insists/ on creating an instance for you is beyond me..
Zope 2.6 i
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1110 +0200]:
> Does the package fail to install in this case? That's perfectly reasonable
> behavior if the user is ignoring critical questions from debconf. The
> solution for such cases is for the user to either preseed the debconf cach
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 06:43:43PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.25.1814 +0200]:
> > Even with this patch applied, I would think the bug would still appear
> > with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive, no?
> Yes, and then we have a problem bec
also sprach Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.25.1814 +0200]:
> Even with this patch applied, I would think the bug would still appear
> with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive, no?
Yes, and then we have a problem because there simply is no default
for a password, is there? And I refuse to
8 matches
Mail list logo
