Re: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

2005-04-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:58:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 16:35]: > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > Package: freebsd5-buildutils > > > > Ver

Re: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

2005-04-03 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 16:35]: > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Package: freebsd5-buildutils > > > Version: 5.3+2-2 > > > Severity: serious > > > Tags: sarge > > > > > > > >

Re: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

2005-03-30 Thread Martin Schulze
Adrian Bunk wrote: > Security support can turn out to be a nightmare if build dependencies > aren't fulfilled. As security bloke I can only agree to this. Regards, Joey -- Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

2005-03-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:03:40AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Why don't you avoid all the possible problems for security support in > testing by handling build dependencies as dependencies? This has been discussed over the past couple of days; it may be best to turn on build-dep checking in brit

Re: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

2005-03-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 19:35]: > > If testing should make any sense, handling build dependencies as > > dependencies in the testing scripts was required. > > We all know that your opinion about the usefulness of t

Re: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

2005-03-29 Thread Andreas Barth
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 19:35]: > If testing should make any sense, handling build dependencies as > dependencies in the testing scripts was required. We all know that your opinion about the usefulness of testing differes from the one the release team has. Please just accept th

Re: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

2005-03-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 16:35]: > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Package: freebsd5-buildutils > > > Version: 5.3+2-2 > > > Severity: serious > > > Tags: sarge > > > > > > > >

Re: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

2005-03-29 Thread Andreas Barth
* Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 16:35]: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Package: freebsd5-buildutils > > Version: 5.3+2-2 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: sarge > > > > > > The build dependency on type-handling (>= 0.2.5) can't > > be fulfilled in sar

Re: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

2005-03-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: freebsd5-buildutils > Version: 5.3+2-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: sarge > > > The build dependency on type-handling (>= 0.2.5) can't > be fulfilled in sarge. So why did it migrate to sarge in first place? CCing debian-rele