On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:52:35AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I don't think this is an issue for the sarge release, myself. I'd much
> > rather have a well-tested 1.1.0 in sarge than try to force in 1.1.1 when it
> > is obviously a m
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> severity 275324 wishlist
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:20:43AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> > We have a problem. It seems that FLAC 1.1.1 is not exactly "just an
> > update":
> >
> > 1) It changed a lot of APIs (so we need
severity 275324 wishlist
thanks
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:20:43AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> We have a problem. It seems that FLAC 1.1.1 is not exactly "just an
> update":
>
> 1) It changed a lot of APIs (so we need a new soname for some of the libs)
>(i.e. they changed so
3 matches
Mail list logo