Re: Bug#263019: This bug is definitely RC

2004-08-03 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-02 15:08]: > > > > If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (>= 2.15) the dependencies need an update. > > > you didn't give any reason. downgrading. > > According to this bug gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 uses the --as-needed option of > ld which is new i

Re: Bug#263019: This bug is definitely RC

2004-08-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-02 15:08]: > > > If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (>= 2.15) the dependencies need an update. > > you didn't give any reason. downgrading. According to this bug gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 uses the --as-needed option of ld which is new in 2.15-1. If this is true, then not

Re: Bug#263019: This bug is definitely RC

2004-08-02 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 263019 minor thanks Adrian Bunk writes: > severity 263019 grave > thanks > > If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (>= 2.15) the dependencies need an update. you didn't give any reason. downgrading. Matthias

Re: Bug#263019: This bug is definitely RC

2004-08-02 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:26:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > severity 263019 minor > thanks > > Adrian Bunk writes: > > severity 263019 grave > > thanks > > > > If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (>= 2.15) the dependencies need an update. > > you didn't give any reason. downgrading. > > Ma