Re: Bug#241497: Critical bug still not addressed: upgrade-i386

2004-08-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:04:30AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:19:22 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The upgrade-only kernels would be intended solely as an intermediate step > > during the upgrade process; users should be encouraged to install kernels > > from the main a

Re: Bug#241497: Critical bug still not addressed: upgrade-i386

2004-08-10 Thread Andres Salomon
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:19:22 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The upgrade-only kernels would be intended solely as an intermediate step > during the upgrade process; users should be encouraged to install kernels > from the main archive as well as part of the upgrade process. As such, we > can pro

Re: Bug#241497: Critical bug still not addressed: upgrade-i386

2004-08-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:37:00AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:56:45 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > Reminder: the directory > > dists/sarge/main/upgrade-i386 > > still has not been created, let alone populated. > Oh, yuck. This is the first I've heard of this proble

Re: Bug#241497: Critical bug still not addressed: upgrade-i386

2004-08-10 Thread Andres Salomon
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:56:45 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Reminder: the directory > dists/sarge/main/upgrade-i386 > still has not been created, let alone populated. Oh, yuck. This is the first I've heard of this problem. > > I would expect this to be a hard requirement before sarge can be