On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 16:59 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Note: I've unarchived this bug and proposed a trivial patch:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024730
>
> Hopefully there will be another release.debian.org request
> soon for net-tools to complement this one.
OK, tha
Note: I've unarchived this bug and proposed a trivial patch:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024730
Hopefully there will be another release.debian.org request
soon for net-tools to complement this one.
Thanks.
Unfortunately it's not that simple:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
net-tools: libdnet-dev
Hi. Additional tests indicate that such build-dependency
is not really used to build the package.
When I build the package with and without it, the resulting .deb
packages are es
El 19/8/24 a las 7:39, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 02:25 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
I believe this package (dnprogs) should be removed from bullseye
in the next (and last) upcoming point release.
- Main reason: Packages in bullseye must build in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +moreinfo
Bug #1079021 [release.debian.org] RM: dnprogs/2.65
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1079021: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079021
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 02:25 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I believe this package (dnprogs) should be removed from bullseye
> in the next (and last) upcoming point release.
>
> - Main reason: Packages in bullseye must build in bullseye.
>
> This package does not build f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanv...@debian.org
Dear Release Managers:
I believe this package (dnprogs) should be removed from bullseye
in the next (and last) upcoming point release.
- Main reason: Packages
7 matches
Mail list logo
