Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1070998 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package fossil/2.24-5~deb11u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1070998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1070998 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package fossil/2.24-5~deb11u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1070998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 05:47:31PM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> I have not attached the debdiff due to the fix beeing a backport from sid.
> Attached debdiff to sid instead
This is not sufficient, you need to attach the source debdiff of your proposed
upload relativ
Hi Bastien,
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 05:47:31PM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bookworm
> X-Debbugs-Cc: fos...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:fossil
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> this bug
Thanks!
I guess preparing these is pretty straightforward.
Would like to think my efforts to keep debian/rules etc clean and tidy
made this work so easily.
Given that the patch is nothing but a changelog entry, I'm assuming
it's not really worth making a branch on fossil.
" * Backport to bookworm
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
X-Debbugs-Cc: fos...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:fossil
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
this bug was opened by previous arrangement with maintainer.
[ Reason ]
fossil is affected by a regressio
6 matches
Mail list logo
