Paul Gevers dijo [Sat, May 06, 2023 at 08:22:26AM +0200]:
> On 06-05-2023 08:01, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > What I plan to do (but please, others are welcome to do so 😇) is to
> > wait for a month, until bookworm is released, and upload to
> > stable-proposed-uploads a 0.26-2+1 or somesuch, including t
(re-sending to bug which I forgot to CC)
Hi,
On 2023-05-05 20:05, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Also sbuild-qemu is a direct reverse dependency of vmdb2. I haven't
> looked deep there.
sbuild-qemu is just a simple wrapper around autopkgtest-build-qemu that
simplifies the image customziation process.
s
Hi,
On 2023-05-05 20:05, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Also sbuild-qemu is a direct reverse dependency of vmdb2. I haven't
> looked deep there.
sbuild-qemu is just a simple wrapper around autopkgtest-build-qemu that
simplifies the image customziation process.
sbuild-qemu doesn't need vmdb2 itself; it o
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 07:00:16PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Gunnar Wolf (2023-04-14):
> > vmdb2 is a leaf package. The code changes are quite minor. While there
> > are several alternatives to vmdb2 in Debian, switching from one image
> > generating system to another might be quite heavy fo
Hi Gunnar,
On 06-05-2023 08:01, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
What I plan to do (but please, others are welcome to do so 😇) is to
wait for a month, until bookworm is released, and upload to
stable-proposed-uploads a 0.26-2+1 or somesuch, including the
following, minimal diff thas has been accpted upstream:
Cyril Brulebois dijo [Sat, May 06, 2023 at 03:19:47AM +0200]:
> OK, so much fail on my part here, my bad.
A fair share of fail in my hands as well: I have been too busy, and
unable to react on this issue.
> That being said, it seems pretty clear to me at this point that the
> proposed update isn'
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-05):
> Gunnar Wolf (2023-04-14):
> > vmdb2 is a leaf package. The code changes are quite minor. While there
> > are several alternatives to vmdb2 in Debian, switching from one image
> > generating system to another might be quite heavy for the users.
>
> Spotted by
Hi,
Gunnar Wolf (2023-04-14):
> vmdb2 is a leaf package. The code changes are quite minor. While there
> are several alternatives to vmdb2 in Debian, switching from one image
> generating system to another might be quite heavy for the users.
Spotted by Helmut (cc-ed): that's not true (in either
Hi,
Once more.
On 15-04-2023 03:23, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
[ Checklist ]
[X] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[X] attach debdiff against the package in testing
You (via the janitor) also bumped the debhelper-compat level. That's
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1034428 [release.debian.org] unblock: vmdb2/0.27-1
Bug #1034469 [release.debian.org] unblock: vmdb2/0.27-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1034428: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034428
1034469: https://bug
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Gunnar,
On 15-04-2023 03:23, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
The debdiff might seem a bit large, at 900 lines, but it is partly due
to upstream having included a patch we used to apply at build time.
Could you prepare a diff between the sources with patches applied? To
verify
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: vm...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:vmdb2
Please unblock package vmdb2
[ Reason ]
The main driver for uploading this vmdb release is bug #1031364:
Generating
12 matches
Mail list logo
