On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 10:19:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I think we'll probably want to swap from a mozjs91-based gjs to a
> mozjs102-based gjs either before or during the mutter/Shell transition
> (#1018118)
I'm having trouble finding the right arguments for `dak rm -n`, but I
think the tra
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 06:51:47 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> This will also affect Cinnamon once Cinnamon gets around to building
> their cjs fork of gjs with a newer mozjs.
cjs is currently still on mozjs78, so I would not expect this to happen
soon, and I think it should be treated as a separate
This will also affect Cinnamon once Cinnamon gets around to building
their cjs fork of gjs with a newer mozjs.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 06:40:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> For avoidance of doubt, I didn't ACK or NACK the transition. I just wanted
> to answer Simon's question about the course of solutions.
I think we'll probably want to swap from a mozjs91-based gjs to a
mozjs102-based gjs either before or d
Hi,
On 30-08-2022 22:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
[...]
For avoidance of doubt, I didn't ACK or NACK the transition. I just
wanted to answer Simon's question about the course of solutions.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Simon, all,
On 30-08-2022 14:48, Simon McVittie wrote:
If armel is a candidate for being a release architecture, then I think
that leaves two-and-a-half options:
In the last couple of releases, we have been bad at taking decisions on
this front, so lets assume it is (although this issue is
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 13:14:33 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Simon McVittie dijo [Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:19:30AM +0100]:
> > Is armel a realistic candidate for being a Debian 12 release
> > architecture?
>
> I do not feel armel systems are hard to come by, nor marginal in the
> amount of users the
Simon McVittie dijo [Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:19:30AM +0100]:
> Obviously that's quite a bit of churn, mostly in packages that, in
> practice, have never been useful to run on the 2009-2010 plug computers
> that seem to be the main use-case for armel.
>
> Is armel a realistic candidate for being a
thanks and sorry for the stupid question :)
dpkg-query -W libgjs0g
libgjs0g:arm64 1.73.1-1
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 3:02 PM Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 14:24:46 +0200, Renato Gallo wrote:
> > Linux raspberrypi 6.0.0-rc1-v8+ #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 19 14:48:09 CEST
> 2022
> > a
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 14:24:46 +0200, Renato Gallo wrote:
> Linux raspberrypi 6.0.0-rc1-v8+ #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 19 14:48:09 CEST 2022
> aarch64 GNU/Linux
> I am using gnome on a raspberrypi4 8GB ram (arm64) without problems.
If you are using the arm64 or armhf architecture, as you should be fo
stupid question .
Linux raspberrypi 6.0.0-rc1-v8+ #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 19 14:48:09 CEST
2022 aarch64 GNU/Linux
I am using gnome on a raspberrypi4 8GB ram (arm64) without problems.
Will this removal affect me ?
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:21 PM Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: rele...@debian
11 matches
Mail list logo
