On 2022-03-28 12:57:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Right, multiarch.
> Rebuilding on all architectures wouldn't help, as the other
> architectures would be bumped too, so we only want to rebuild ia64
> and riscv64. Scheduled.
Thanks for the clarifications. I think based on this that in the
future I s
On 2022-03-28 11:57:14, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
>
> On 28-03-2022 10:20, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > nmu libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "riscv64 arch is at
> > 1:1.1.4-1
> > while others are at 1:1.1.4-1+b2"
>
> It may be obvious to you, but, so what? Why is that a problem an
Hi Jordan,
On 28-03-2022 10:20, Jordan Justen wrote:
nmu libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "riscv64 arch is at 1:1.1.4-1
while others are at 1:1.1.4-1+b2"
It may be obvious to you, but, so what? Why is that a problem and how
does rebuilding on all architectures solve that?
Paul
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "riscv64 arch is at 1:1.1.4-1
while others are at 1:1.1.4-1+b2"
4 matches
Mail list logo
