Re: Broken (looser) dependencies due to dpkg-dev bug

2009-07-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raphael Hertzog (12/07/2009): > build-admins must ensure build chroots have dpkg-dev 1.15.3.1 and > trigger bin-nmu of eglibc and libvirt afterwards. kfreebsd-* are ready. Wasn't sure whether to schedule binNMUs on my own, so I initially planned to w

Re: Broken (looser) dependencies due to dpkg-dev bug

2009-07-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:06:01 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Ordered by rounds (next round cannot be started until the previous one > > has been built everywhere): > > Actually, only the ones with wildcards produce broken symbols files, > the updates l

Re: Broken (looser) dependencies due to dpkg-dev bug

2009-07-08 Thread Riku Voipio
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 03:59:15PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:06:01 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Ordered by rounds (next round cannot be started until the previous one > > has been built everywhere): > Actually, only the ones with wildcards produce broken symbols fil

Re: Broken (looser) dependencies due to dpkg-dev bug

2009-07-08 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:06:01 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Ordered by rounds (next round cannot be started until the previous one > has been built everywhere): Actually, only the ones with wildcards produce broken symbols files, the updates list (by checking now the source packages): eglibc

Broken (looser) dependencies due to dpkg-dev bug

2009-07-08 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! Due to an unfortunate copy-and-paste typo, dpkg-gensymbols has been generating broken symbol files since dpkg 1.15.3 (2009-06-27), which makes the dependencies of packages using those shared libraries looser than they should. The bug in question is #536034. I've just uploaded a fixed dpkg (1.