Re: Bits from the release team: the plans for etch

Hi, Luk Claes wrote: >>>0-day NMUs are fine, as long as it is emphasized that it's only >>>appropriate if the usual maintainer doesn't work on the issue. I.e. you >>>either need to try to contact the developer or only operate on >>>reasonably "old" bugs; better both. >>> >>>Otherwise things like >

Re: Bits from the release team: the plans for etch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi, Hi > thanks for the update. > > Steve Langasek wrote: > >>NMU policy >>~~ >>After lots of experimentation with NMU policies during the sarge release >>process, it's pretty clear that permissive NMU policies had a

Re: Bits from the release team: the plans for etch

Hi, thanks for the update. Steve Langasek wrote: > NMU policy > ~~ > After lots of experimentation with NMU policies during the sarge release > process, it's pretty clear that permissive NMU policies had a HUGE, > positive impact on our ability as a project to cope with outstanding > rele