I wrote:
> > The solution is obvious: please include a list (ideally at the beginning)
> > of changed packages in the release that were not previously available from
> > security.debian.org. In most cases this will be a very small list.
Martin Schulze wrote:
> I already say "DSA nnn-m" in the fir
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Hmm... perhaps the wording was not the best. The intrusive change was
> 0.80.0-4; in 0.80.0-4 I changed the libpng depencency and that change
> was caught in the middle of the freeze (that is, -4 got into testing,
> but other packages recompiled against this versio
Joe Buck wrote:
> I've had a consistent problem over the years with the announcements that
> are sent out for updates to the stable distribution, one that should be
> easily correctable.
Hmm
> The messages are written as if it is assumed that people don't apply security
> updates. It is typical
Hi,
I've had a consistent problem over the years with the announcements that
are sent out for updates to the stable distribution, one that should be
easily correctable.
The messages are written as if it is assumed that people don't apply security
updates. It is typical that an update to stable c
Le Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:55:36PM +0200, Martin Schulze écrivait:
> liblocale-gettext-perl stable1.01-11 alpha, arm, hppa, i386,
> ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc, source
> liblocale-gettext-perl updates 1.01-11a.woody alpha, arm, hppa, i386,
> ia64, m68k, mipsel,
>> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libwings-dev stable0.80.0-4alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
> m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> libwings-dev updates 0.80.0-4woody1 alpha, arm, i386, ia64, m68k,
> mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> libwmaker0-de
6 matches
Mail list logo