Re: BinNMU for obby

2006-05-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:40:54PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 13:06 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > If gmp has changed its API then the dev package has to change its > > name. If the ABI changed then the soname must change. > I consider this as a RC critical bug in g

Re: BinNMU for obby

2006-05-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Have you checked that a recompiled obby will work with older gmp >> packages? If that is not the case then you have no choice but to >> properly fix this at the source level. > > They most probably won't work with older, but I could force a shlibs > vers

Re: BinNMU for obby

2006-05-19 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 13:06 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > If gmp has changed its API then the dev package has to change its > name. If the ABI changed then the soname must change. I consider this as a RC critical bug in gmp anyway, if it is really the cause of the problem, and as the recomp

Re: BinNMU for obby

2006-05-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi there, > > it seems that some A(P|B)I changes in the most recent gmp upload broke > obby and causes its dependent applications to FTBFS (see RC bug > #367862). > > A simple recompile of obby against the current gmp version in the > archive fixed the co

BinNMU for obby

2006-05-18 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi there, it seems that some A(P|B)I changes in the most recent gmp upload broke obby and causes its dependent applications to FTBFS (see RC bug #367862). A simple recompile of obby against the current gmp version in the archive fixed the compilation error for me, so please schedule a BinNMU of o