On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:39:49PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:11 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Can you please explain why you think this is a proper fix for the
> > > problem?
> > Because the error
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:39:49PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:11 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Can you please explain why you think this is a proper fix for the
> > problem?
> Because the error message displayed by xhotswap suggests that rebuilding
> would fix the pr
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:11 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> Can you please explain why you think this is a proper fix for the
> problem?
Because the error message displayed by xhotswap suggests that rebuilding
would fix the problem. If it does not, then I will report a bug...
> Also you are not
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:31:37PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Dear release managers,
> could you please rebuild the hotswap source package to fix this bug ?
Can you please explain why you think this is a proper fix for the
problem?
> $ xhotswap
> xhotswap: Symbol `_XmStrings' has different s
Dear release managers,
could you please rebuild the hotswap source package to fix this bug ?
$ xhotswap
xhotswap: Symbol `_XmStrings' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
5 matches
Mail list logo