On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:48:24 +0200, ancow wrote:
> Multiarch being a release goal, I'd consider this issue release critical, but
> maybe that's just me...
>
"Release goal" very much implies "not release critical".
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mié 15 Aug 2012 08:52:55 Philipp Kern escribió:
> Lisandro,
>
> am Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:07:34PM -0300 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > On the other hand, IMPOV, if it's RC, the real bug it's on the
> > buildds/dpkg, and it should be RC too.
>
> the buildds really don't have anything to do
Lisandro,
am Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:07:34PM -0300 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> On the other hand, IMPOV, if it's RC, the real bug it's on the buildds/dpkg,
> and it should be RC too.
the buildds really don't have anything to do with it. Maybe the infrastructure
should prevent people from do
On Mar 14 Aug 2012 20:48:24 ancow escribió:
[snip]
> Multiarch being a release goal, I'd consider this issue release critical,
> but maybe that's just me...
This is the part I don't really know. If it's considered RC, then things
change, but so far no one confirmed nor denied me this.
On the ot
Am Mittwoch 15.08.2012, 01:24:48 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> We (as in pkg-kde team) have decided to avoid reuploading Qt for some more
> time in case some other bug appears. On the other hand, I really don't know
> if this kind of upload would be acceptable by the RT for unblock
On Sáb 11 Aug 2012 12:18:22 Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 22:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > I update my system (Sid) just mow, and got some errors due to BinNUM of
> > QT.
[snip]
> > The problem is there unsloved, and USERs are using my system, and
> > We know exactly that
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 22:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
>> I update my system (Sid) just mow, and got some errors due to BinNUM of QT.
>
> and have you discussed this with the maintainers, who requested the
> binNMU? (CCed)
>
>> I aware of
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 22:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> I update my system (Sid) just mow, and got some errors due to BinNUM of QT.
and have you discussed this with the maintainers, who requested the
binNMU? (CCed)
> I aware of the technical debate on multiarch and binnum, it seems that all
> g
I update my system (Sid) just mow, and got some errors due to BinNUM of QT.
I aware of the technical debate on multiarch and binnum, it seems that all guys
there have their sufficient arguments. It's great technical debate, WHILE:
The problem is there unsloved, and USERs are using my system, and
9 matches
Mail list logo
