On 2014-03-21 03:49, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Yeah, it's not working. I've got it on my TODO list, but haven't had a
>> chance to work on it yet. I will probably have a chance next weekend
>> to spend some time on it.
>
> So I think I've fixed this now; h
Hi Don,
On Freitag, 21. März 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> So I think I've fixed this now; had to finally set up a testing
> framework for bugscan to get at it, but that was long overdue anyway.
yay! thanks!
> I've just merged the changes, so we'll have to wait until the next
> bugscan run to be
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Yeah, it's not working. I've got it on my TODO list, but haven't had a
> chance to work on it yet. I will probably have a chance next weekend
> to spend some time on it.
So I think I've fixed this now; had to finally set up a testing
framework for bugsca
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Looks like it didn't work. UDD is now listing ~310 RC bugs for testing
> and the BTS thinks there are ~480 RC bugs in stable. There was a drop a
> little while back, but I suspect it was the related to the recent stable
> update.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, H
Hi Don,
On Freitag, 7. Februar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I've now rolled this out, but bugscan's crontab hasn't run yet. I'll
> keep an eye on it to make sure it works.
https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ doens't look like it's working :/
Could you please have a look again?
cheers,
On 2014-02-07 21:28, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using
>> bugcfg instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I
>> just fixed this in @81492, but I haven't rolled it out to the BTS y
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using
> bugcfg instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I
> just fixed this in @81492, but I haven't rolled it out to the BTS yet.
I've now rolled this out, but bugscan's cr
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 05/02/14 at 18:52 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Hi BTS people and UDD,
> >
> > We have noticed that some bugs tagged wheezy-ignore appears on the BTS
> > list of RC bugs affecting stable. As an example, the list[1] contains
> > #710069 and #710357
Hi Niels,
On 05/02/14 at 18:52 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi BTS people and UDD,
>
> We have noticed that some bugs tagged wheezy-ignore appears on the BTS
> list of RC bugs affecting stable. As an example, the list[1] contains
> #710069 and #710357. Both of these were tagged "wheezy-ignore"
Hi BTS people and UDD,
We have noticed that some bugs tagged wheezy-ignore appears on the BTS
list of RC bugs affecting stable. As an example, the list[1] contains
#710069 and #710357. Both of these were tagged "wheezy-ignore" on the
28th of November.
Currently, UDD's bug view[2] claims that Wh
10 matches
Mail list logo
