On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 19:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:22 -0700, Chris Taylor wrote:
> > I am currently in the process of preparing the transition of Audacious
> > to the new 2.3 stable branch. The current highest version in Debian is
> > 2.1 so I am pushing to try to
which suggests that this wouldn't so much be an audacious transition, as
a libmowgli transition.
However, /why/ does audacious depend on libmowgli being updated? The
build-dependency for the audacious package in experimental is
"libmowgli-dev (>= 0.4)" which is satisfied by th
Hello,
I am currently in the process of preparing the transition of Audacious
to the new 2.3 stable branch. The current highest version in Debian is
2.1 so I am pushing to try to have 2.3 in Squeeze.
The transition is currently blocked by libmowgli needing to transition
to unstable, but that is b
3 matches
Mail list logo
