Roland Mas wrote:
> I'm told (on IRC) that the mipsel build has been ongoing for a few
> days already. And mips has perl in its "Not-for-us" list, whatever
> that means (I'm a buildd newbie). So I'm currently building perl
> 5.8.2-2 by hand on casals.debian.org "by hand". Do tell me if it's
> no
Roland Mas, 2003-11-19 14:30:26 +0100 :
> Steve Langasek, 2003-11-18 08:00:13 +0100 :
>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:29:28AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> perl: Just waiting for its wait time to go.
>>
>> It's specifically waiting for uploads on mips and mipsel.
>
> I'm told (on
Steve Langasek, 2003-11-18 08:00:13 +0100 :
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:29:28AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
[...]
>> perl: Just waiting for its wait time to go.
>
> It's specifically waiting for uploads on mips and mipsel.
I'm told (on IRC) that the mipsel build has been ongoing for a few
d
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:41:02PM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Your point being?
> That Nathanael's list is missing one important subsystem.
I see, I did not get it because of the nullquote.
> > From reading debian-x I got the firm impression tha
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Your point being?
That Nathanael's list is missing one important subsystem.
> From reading debian-x I got the firm impression that we'll have 4.3.0
> in sarge (unless our time estimates are completely off and sarge wil
> be released in June).
Is it
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:15:25AM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
> xfree86 4.1.3: still in experimental, adds support for a
> bunch of important video chipsets, including most new
> laptops. Upstream 4.1.4 is advertised to release 15
> December.
Your point being?
From reading debian-x I got the
Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> Say 'A' depends on 'B' with a matching version number. In testing
> we have:
>
> A_1 B_1
>
> and in unstable:
>
> A_1 B_2
>
> We can't move B into testing since it's waiting for A. Now someone
> uploads a new version of B,
>
> A_1 B_3
>
> and shortly af
xfree86 4.1.3: still in experimental, adds support for a
bunch of important video chipsets, including most new
laptops. Upstream 4.1.4 is advertised to release 15
December.
--Andre, raining on the parade
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:40:35AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> do we have a period in the release cycle, where no new versions enter
> unstable, so that packages depending on other packages can catch up?
> something like a bug fixing upload period only?
I had another idea. In my spare time I'v
Steve Langasek writes:
> Oh, well, I think there are at least a few people who would mind if we
> released with a completely broken set of php4 packages. But this is
> trivial to fix once perl is in.
do we have a period in the release cycle, where no new versions enter
unstable, so that packages
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:29:28AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> GNOME 2: All the libraries need to pass their 10-day wait times, and then
> most of it should go in at once, probably leaving only a couple of packages
> to fix.
orbit2, libbonobo, it looks like. So this should be ready to go i
So, things look pretty good actually.
KDE 3: Frustratingly slow.
* Still waiting for kdebase 3.1.4 upload which is fully installable (including
kdebase-dev, and therefore ksysguard). This is probably keeping other kde
packages out indirectly; when their -dev Build-Dependencies are uninstallable,
12 matches
Mail list logo
