On 2016-10-30 12:23 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Architecture qualification for Debian 9 'Stretch' will take place in
> oftc/#debian-release on Sun Oct 30 20:00:00 UTC 2016.
>
> (With apologies for the short notice.)
Too short for me, sorry. Missed it. Hopefully that didn't matter.
Wookey
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 22:08 +0900, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> In case you're going to axe powerpc - which I assume you will - please let
> it at least exist in Debian Ports.
The Release Team don't manage the Ports archive. It's not in our gift to
decide which architectures it contains.
Re
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:23:32PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>Architecture qualification for Debian 9 'Stretch' will take place in
>oftc/#debian-release on Sun Oct 30 20:00:00 UTC 2016.
>
>The meeting is primarily a discussion amongst the release team. We will
>evaluate each port on the most
On 10/30/2016 09:23 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Architecture qualification for Debian 9 'Stretch' will take place in
> oftc/#debian-release on Sun Oct 30 20:00:00 UTC 2016.
Ugh, that would be 4 AM here in Hong Kong where I currently am. Had hoped
this discussion could have been held in Novembe
Architecture qualification for Debian 9 'Stretch' will take place in
oftc/#debian-release on Sun Oct 30 20:00:00 UTC 2016.
The meeting is primarily a discussion amongst the release team. We will
evaluate each port on the most up-to-date information available to us,
and determine if it will be a r
Adrian Bunk:
> [ fullquote adding -ports, for people not following -release or -devel ]
>
> [...]
>
> Is https://release.debian.org/stretch/arch_qualify.html the up-to-date
> information available to you, and the "candidate" line how a decision
> would look like based on the current information?
[ fullquote adding -ports, for people not following -release or -devel ]
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:35:07PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am arranging the final architecture qualification meeting for Stretch.
> This is primarily of interest to the release team, but
Hi,
I am arranging the final architecture qualification meeting for Stretch.
This is primarily of interest to the release team, but I will also take
input from porters.
As the schedule is currently wide open, please express your availability
in the linked Doodle poll. There are 56 slots
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:48:48PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Yeah, thanks for starting the wiki. Honestly I am not sure the wiki is
> the optimal place for it, but I guess it will do for now (and it is less
> likely to "disappear" than in the mail archive).
>
> I will try to see if we can kee
On 2012-05-05 02:53, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
Hi,
> I'm not DM/DD, but, I thought the summary you gave the other week [1]
> looked like a good starting point for a Wiki page of all
> considerations/concerns.
>
> Since the outcome of the archive qualification ought to be documente
Hi Niels,
I'm not DM/DD, but, I thought the summary you gave the other week [1]
looked like a good starting point for a Wiki page of all
considerations/concerns.
Since the outcome of the archive qualification ought to be documented
anyway, I went ahead and started off a new Wiki page [2] for this
On May 2, 2012 23:09 "Andreas Barth" wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [120430 20:30]:
> > [...]
> >
> > So far there have only been two responses, one of which was from me.
> > :-/
> >
> > If this is due to people not liking the included dates, please
> > suggest
> > others.
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [120430 20:30]:
> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 23:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 13:46 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > fwiw, the next sensible weekends (i.e. ignoring the one in a couple of
> > > days time) are May 5/6th - which
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 19:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 23:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > As mentioned on IRC, a Doodle for the former -
> > http://www.doodle.com/qxr4u5xa29yk3tid
>
> So far there have only been two responses, one of which was from me. :-/
Now up t
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 23:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 13:46 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > fwiw, the next sensible weekends (i.e. ignoring the one in a couple of
> > days time) are May 5/6th - which is a three-day holiday weekend in the
> > UK - and 12/13th, which i
Joerg Jaspert writes:
> On 12824 March 1977, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> """
>> The Debian GNU/Hurd port can almost completely be installed from the
>> official mirrors, using the standard Debian Installer.
>> """
>
>> Not sure if that means "we have imported packages" (which are not
>> showing up on
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [120425 14:47]:
> fwiw, the next sensible weekends (i.e. ignoring the one in a couple of
> days time) are May 5/6th - which is a three-day holiday weekend in the
> UK - and 12/13th, which is the York BSP. I could do the latter but
> would prefer t
On 12824 March 1977, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [3]
> http://raphaelhertzog.com/2012/04/19/people-behind-debian-samuel-thibault-working-on-accessibility-and-the-hurd/
>
> """
> The Debian GNU/Hurd port can almost completely be installed from the
> official mirrors, using the standard Debian Installer.
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 13:46 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> fwiw, the next sensible weekends (i.e. ignoring the one in a couple of
> days time) are May 5/6th - which is a three-day holiday weekend in the
> UK - and 12/13th, which is the York BSP. I could do the latter but
> would prefer the for
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 23:19 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> As for meeting preps, I must admit that I found it rather difficult to
> work out what needs to be prepared.
I was largely hoping to avoid discussions around what people's feelings
on arches were and concentrate more on technical points. I
On 2012-04-25 14:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 22.04.2012 22:19, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>> I originally wanted the length of the meeting to be an hour at most. I
>> had a draft agenda that I never got around to send out[1]. Looking back
>> at it now, I am not entirely sure if it is realis
On 22.04.2012 22:19, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-04-20 22:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Per discussions on #d-release, we have decided to postpone the
meeting
till some time after Easter.
It's now distinctly after Easter, and we need to l
On 2012-04-20 22:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Per discussions on #d-release, we have decided to postpone the meeting
>> till some time after Easter.
>
> It's now distinctly after Easter, and we need to look at rescheduling
> this.
>
> Do
On 2012-04-22 10:42, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:32:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> Per discussions on #d-release, we have decided to postpone the meeting
>>> till some time after Easter.
>>
>> It's now dis
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:32:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Per discussions on #d-release, we have decided to postpone the meeting
> > till some time after Easter.
>
> It's now distinctly after Easter, and we need to look at resche
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Per discussions on #d-release, we have decided to postpone the meeting
> till some time after Easter.
It's now distinctly after Easter, and we need to look at rescheduling
this.
Do we want to start from looking at dates, or working out how
On Mar 30, 2012 08:30 "Niels Thykier" wrote:
> On 2012-03-30 00:16, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Thanks. So one more time :).
>
> I propose we do an architecture qualification meeting over the Easter
> holidays. I have setup a doddle for it
sense to have someone from the DSA team present during
> > that IRC meeting, as architecture qualification has a direct impact on
> > our hardware and resource planning.
> >
> > Could you set up a doodle for that, and keep us posted?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mart
lification has a direct impact on
> our hardware and resource planning.
>
> Could you set up a doodle for that, and keep us posted?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
Thanks. So one more time :).
I propose we do an architecture qualification meeting over the Easter
holidays. I have
29 matches
Mail list logo
