Steve Langasek writes:
> If the current release plan holds, the final Packages file may vary by a few
> dozen packages in or out; I wouldn't expect it to be much more than that.
>
> [...]
>
> Generally, the packages that get removed due to RC-bugginess are leaf
> packages or clusters of niche pack
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:59:20PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> Debram (part of Debtags) needs something approximating
> a final sarge package list. The latest
> /dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/Packages file
> (2 April 2005) is publicly available, and this probably
> suffices, but I have one qu
"Thaddeus H. Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Question: at the moment, does testing significantly lack
> packages which
>
> * were present in testing recently, and
> * will probably rejoin testing before the release?
>
Hi,
I'm not a release manager, but WvStreams, RetchMail, and Wv
Debram (part of Debtags) needs something approximating
a final sarge package list. The latest
/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/Packages file
(2 April 2005) is publicly available, and this probably
suffices, but I have one question for Colin or whoever
else can briefly answer.
Question: at the moment
4 matches
Mail list logo
