Re: Approval for a devscripts t-p-u upload

On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:44 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 18:37 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> I've attached a minimal debdiff against the lenny version of devscripts > >> for consideration. > > > > As has just been pointed out to me, the version nu

Re: Approval for a devscripts t-p-u upload

Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 18:37 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> I've attached a minimal debdiff against the lenny version of devscripts >> for consideration. > > As has just been pointed out to me, the version number was broken, as > devscripts is native; fixed debdiff attach

Re: Approval for a devscripts t-p-u upload

On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 18:37 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I've attached a minimal debdiff against the lenny version of devscripts > for consideration. As has just been pointed out to me, the version number was broken, as devscripts is native; fixed debdiff attached. Regards, Adam diff -Nru dev

Approval for a devscripts t-p-u upload

Hi, #508111 highlighted a bug in debsign where a temporary file was generated with a predictable filename due to an incorrect mktemp(1) call. Whilst it doesn't appear that it can be used to overwrite files, if a file of the same name from an earlier attempt to sign the same file (for instance bec