Hi Paul,
Am Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 03:55:14PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Looking at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/netpbm-free_2:10.98.00-1.html,
> is there any reason why you didn't add "Provides:
> libnetpbm9-dev, libnetpbm10-dev"?
Changed in Git[1] to prepare another upload to new.
Thanks
On 25/04/2022 14:55, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On 07-04-2022 09:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
Sorry, that's my fault. I'm preparing an upload to fix #1007984
targeting new.
Looking at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/netpbm-free_2:10.98.00-1.html, is there
any reason why you didn't add "Pr
Hi Andreas,
On 07-04-2022 09:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
Sorry, that's my fault. I'm preparing an upload to fix #1007984
targeting new.
Looking at
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/netpbm-free_2:10.98.00-1.html, is
there any reason why you didn't add "Provides:
libnetpbm9-dev, libnetpbm10-dev
Am Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:53:24AM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2022-04-03 23:43:39, Peter Green wrote:
> > A new version of netpbm-free was recently uploaded to unstable which
> > replaced the libnetpbm9, libnetpbm9-dev, libnetpbm10 and libnetpbm10-dev
> > packages with libnetpbm11 and l
On 2022-04-03 23:43:39, Peter Green wrote:
> A new version of netpbm-free was recently uploaded to unstable which
> replaced the libnetpbm9, libnetpbm9-dev, libnetpbm10 and libnetpbm10-dev
> packages with libnetpbm11 and libnetpbm11-dev packages.
>
> I could not find any evidence of an attempt to
A new version of netpbm-free was recently uploaded to unstable which
replaced the libnetpbm9, libnetpbm9-dev, libnetpbm10 and libnetpbm10-dev
packages with libnetpbm11 and libnetpbm11-dev packages.
I could not find any evidence of an attempt to coordinate this transition
with the release team, no
6 matches
Mail list logo
