Re: Anjuta in squeeze

2010-10-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 03 octobre 2010 à 00:05 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit : > On 10/02/2010 01:50 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > What does this leave us for squeeze? > > * [...] > > * Shipping this patched 2.32 version which should be much more > > stable. > > Go ahead for this o

Re: Anjuta in squeeze

2010-10-02 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 10/02/2010 01:50 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > What does this leave us for squeeze? > * [...] > * Shipping this patched 2.32 version which should be much more > stable. Go ahead for this one. > * [...] > * [...] > Cheers, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http:

Re: Anjuta in squeeze

2010-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 02 octobre 2010 à 15:04 +0100, Luis Matos a écrit : > I am an anjuta user and i like 2.30 a *LOT* more than 2.24, ainly > because of symbol-db. > > I have been presented with some crashes, but few of them and recently > none (i thought they had been fixed :) ). To be fair, some of the

Re: Anjuta in squeeze

2010-10-02 Thread Luis Matos
Hello there! I am an anjuta user and i like 2.30 a *LOT* more than 2.24, ainly because of symbol-db. I have been presented with some crashes, but few of them and recently none (i thought they had been fixed :) ). I would prefer squeeze to ship 2.32. "My two cents, of course " and thanks f

Re: Anjuta in squeeze

2010-10-02 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org): > What does this leave us for squeeze? > * Shipping 2.30.2 with its stability problems, with no upstream > support and no hope to really fix them. > * Shipping this patched 2.32 version which should be much more > stable. >

Anjuta in squeeze

2010-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi all, I’m very worried about the situation of anjuta in squeeze. In version 2.26 anjuta moved all the function indexing code in a new “symbol-db” plugin, which is based on libgda (and in turn sqlite). Don’t be mislead by the “plugin” name, it’s mandatory. This caused all kinds of packaging