Re: Accepted vdr 2.0.3-3 (source amd64 all) into testing-proposed-updates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08.12.2014 19:22, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Well, it also says "it is recommended that you ask for authorization > from the release manager first". Ok. Mea culpa! Next time I know better. >> I will probably upload the package in Sid today, the RC

Re: Accepted vdr 2.0.3-3 (source amd64 all) into testing-proposed-updates

On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 19:18 +0100, Tobias Grimm wrote: > No it wasn't discussed with the release team. Sorry for any > inconveniences, if I should have done this! > > I just followed the instructions in section 5.13.3 of the developers > reference which basically says to upload first and then cont

Re: Accepted vdr 2.0.3-3 (source amd64 all) into testing-proposed-updates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Adam, No it wasn't discussed with the release team. Sorry for any inconveniences, if I should have done this! I just followed the instructions in section 5.13.3 of the developers reference which basically says to upload first and then contact t

Re: Accepted vdr 2.0.3-3 (source amd64 all) into testing-proposed-updates

Hi, On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 00:19 +, Tobias Grimm wrote: > vdr (2.0.3-3) testing; urgency=medium > . >* Fixed use of getent in postinst script for detecting existing vdr user > and > group (Closes: #770773) I noticed that this has been uploaded to t-p-u already. Whilst we clearly li