Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-10-20 Thread Craig Small
Hi Paul, The first two are just how SNMP works, you scan the table and... just fall off it. The last looks like the perl error that has been fixed up. I put some testing on the packages now and the salsa output is all green (I have bypassed the reproducibility tests)[1] This also includes a simp

Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-10-20 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Craig, On 15-10-2019 07:41, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 15-10-2019 01:15, Craig Small wrote: >>  I'll have to build a new version of net-snmp including the library to >> fix at least the perl problem.  For that second upload, do you want me >> to run it through experimental or just upload "normally

documenting transitions (Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2019-10-15 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:24:41PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > >   I think I see the problem, the wiki has two places for transition. > > https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices which speaks to the > Whow, not updated since 2014. > > developer and doesn't mention at all things like goi

Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-10-14 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Craig, On 15-10-2019 01:15, Craig Small wrote: > Hi, >  I'll have to build a new version of net-snmp including the library to > fix at least the perl problem.  For that second upload, do you want me > to run it through experimental or just upload "normally"? As the new soname is already in uns

Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-10-14 Thread Craig Small
Hi, I'll have to build a new version of net-snmp including the library to fix at least the perl problem. For that second upload, do you want me to run it through experimental or just upload "normally"? With the RC bug, it's not going anywhere fast in its current state. - Craig On Tue, 15 Oct 2

Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-10-14 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Craig, On 14-10-2019 04:27, Craig Small wrote: > Hi Paul (and others), >   I think I see the problem, the wiki has two places for transition. > > https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices which speaks to the Whow, not updated since 2014. > developer and doesn't mention at all things li

Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-10-13 Thread Craig Small
Hi Paul (and others), I think I see the problem, the wiki has two places for transition. https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices which speaks to the developer and doesn't mention at all things like going into experimental and https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions which in

Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-10-13 Thread Craig Small
Hi, Source only uploads get automatically rejected so someone needs to fix that then. I originally did upload source only for net-snmp but got the reject message. I never have run a soname change through experimental for any of my packages before, is this a new thing? On Mon, 14 Oct. 2019, 6:49

Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-10-13 Thread Paul Gevers
Dear Craig, Next time, can you please start your transition in experimental? Everybody is supposed to coordinate transitions with us such that they don't interfere with ongoing transitions. I think we're lucky [1], but there were others waiting for a transition slot, so this isn't nice to them. Y