Re: Accepted gnutls26 2.12.23-2 (source all i386)

2013-05-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 19:16:06 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2013-05-16 Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > > If the libraries aren't intended to be co-installable, why are they in > > > > separate source packages? > >> The library

Re: Accepted gnutls26 2.12.23-2 (source all i386)

2013-05-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2013-05-16 Philipp Kern wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > If the libraries aren't intended to be co-installable, why are they in > > > separate source packages? >> The library packages are co-installable, the development packages >> can't be, due to

Re: Accepted gnutls26 2.12.23-2 (source all i386)

2013-05-15 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > If the libraries aren't intended to be co-installable, why are they in > > separate source packages? > The library packages are co-installable, the development packages > can't be, due to libtasn1.so. What's the reason for them b

Re: Accepted gnutls26 2.12.23-2 (source all i386)

2013-05-15 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2013-05-14 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 17:18 +, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > gnutls26 (2.12.23-2) experimental; urgency=low > > . > >* Build against libtasn1-6. > [and subsequently to unstable] > Is there a plan for transitioning to the new library for other rever

Re: Accepted gnutls26 2.12.23-2 (source all i386)

2013-05-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 17:18 +, Andreas Metzler wrote: > gnutls26 (2.12.23-2) experimental; urgency=low > . >* Build against libtasn1-6. [and subsequently to unstable] Is there a plan for transitioning to the new library for other reverse dependencies? Right now packages such as empathy