Re: Accepted bash 4.2-4wheezy0.1 (source all amd64)

2012-12-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 20:37 +0100, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:29:30AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On 27.12.2012 00:47, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > > > bash (4.2-4wheezy0.1) testing; urgency=low [...] > > However, was this upload discussed with anyone on the Release

Re: Accepted bash 4.2-4wheezy0.1 (source all amd64)

2012-12-27 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:29:30AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 27.12.2012 00:47, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > > bash (4.2-4wheezy0.1) testing; urgency=low > > . > > * Non-maintainer upload. > > * debian/bash.preinst-lib.c: pass F_[GS]ETFD, not F_[GS]ETFL, > >to fcntl > > to set FD_CLO

Re: Accepted bash 4.2-4wheezy0.1 (source all amd64)

2012-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:29:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I see that the bug log says that the package in unstable "won't be > granted a freeze exception", but I'm also not aware of anyone > actually having asked us about that; apologies if I simply missed > the discussion. > I've now unbl

Re: Accepted bash 4.2-4wheezy0.1 (source all amd64)

2012-12-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 27.12.2012 00:47, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: bash (4.2-4wheezy0.1) testing; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/bash.preinst-lib.c: pass F_[GS]ETFD, not F_[GS]ETFL, to fcntl to set FD_CLOEXEC flag, avoiding "Inappropriate ioctl for device" errors installing using