On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 15:59 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On So, 22 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > With the version changed to 2009-11+squeeze1, please feel free to
> > re-upload.
>
> I made the changes in our svn, build new packages and uploaded with
> this version number.
>
> Just for
On So, 22 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> With the version changed to 2009-11+squeeze1, please feel free to
> re-upload.
I made the changes in our svn, build new packages and uploaded with
this version number.
Just for completeness I attach the real debdiff now, as the date
has changed.
Best
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 23:38 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I've prepared the upload and uploaded to stable. Debdiff below, please
> tell me if somehting is missing (haven't done that for ages).
The intention was to send the debdiff /before/ the upload, not at the
same time.
As Julien mentioned, yo
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 23:38:17 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> +texlive-base (2009-12) stable; urgency=low
You need to use a different version number, you already uploaded a
package with this version last August. 2009-11+squeeze1 would be the
usual pattern.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descrip
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 19:45 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [...]
>> >> - add an appropriate fixed version to #612924, which right now claims
>> >> not to be fixed in any versio
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 19:45 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> >> - add an appropriate fixed version to #612924, which right now claims
> >> not to be fixed in any version
> >>
> >> - prepare an updated pa
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, the line was commented out somewhere between the
>> version in squeeze and the package in wheezy/sid. Assuming that's
>> correct, please:
>>
>> - add an appropriate fixed version to #61
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
>Erm, no. The mail you've replied to is about an issue in texlive, which
>has nothing to do with either stable-security or info/dir.gz files.
Oops. Sorry. It went directly beneath the cvs one in my INBOX,
and so I was confused.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking sec
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
>Ping?
buildd.d.o doesn’t have stable-security build logs, but the
package showed up in the meantime. It does not contain the
dir file, so I’m considering the issue solved (for now).
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 22:23 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt dixit:
>
> >Ping?
>
> buildd.d.o doesn’t have stable-security build logs, but the
> package showed up in the meantime. It does not contain the
> dir file, so I’m considering the issue solved (for now).
Erm, no. The mail
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the line was commented out somewhere between the
> version in squeeze and the package in wheezy/sid. Assuming that's
> correct, please:
>
> - add an appropriate fixed version to #612924, which right now claims
> not
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 22:39 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> nearly a year ago I asked about an update to stable, as copied below.
> We never received an answer and forgot about it ourselves. However, we
> do keep getting bug reports about that issue.
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you
Dear (stable) Release Managers,
nearly a year ago I asked about an update to stable, as copied below.
We never received an answer and forgot about it ourselves. However, we
do keep getting bug reports about that issue.
I'd be grateful if someone gave us a heads up: Should we prepare an
upload
Dear stable release managers,
we have a bug report against our package texlive-base in stable that
might be worth fixing in squeeze, or not. Therefore I am asking your
opinion.
There is buggy code in the preinst script that will fail each time it is
called, leading to the preinst failing, hence
14 matches
Mail list logo
