Hi,
Am Dienstag 17 Januar 2006 03:18 schrieb Grant Grundler:
> Debian "testing" (etch) is officially using gcc 4.0, right?
> Does Debian promote binaries from "unstable" (using gcc 4.1) to "testing"?
unstable is using 4.0, too. gcc-4.1 only is in experimental atm.
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:43:37PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:03:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > This is a pretty short list... Would anyone object to binNMUs of the
> > > effected packages on hppa, once a fixed glibc is uploaded?
> > If the bug is in glibc,
> Debian "testing" (etch) is officially using gcc 4.0, right?
The biggest impact is on glibc and code that uses the math "c" routines,
like csqrt () in libm. I don't have any idea how many packages this
affects, but I doubt it's a lot. This isn't an issue for hpux since
the HP library doesn't pr
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:52:34PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
> > > The
> > > only reason they would need rebuilt after a glibc bug fix would be if the
> > > glibc ABI changed in the process, and that would be Very Bad.
> >
> > Yeah, hopefully that doesn't happen.
>
> As I have previously
> > The
> > only reason they would need rebuilt after a glibc bug fix would be if the
> > glibc ABI changed in the process, and that would be Very Bad.
>
> Yeah, hopefully that doesn't happen.
As I have previously mentioned, there is a pending ABI issue affecting
the passing of complex and vect
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:03:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This is a pretty short list... Would anyone object to binNMUs of the
> > effected packages on hppa, once a fixed glibc is uploaded?
>
> If the bug is in glibc, why would any of these packages need binNMUs?
Only if they were stati
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:03:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If the bug is in glibc, why would any of these packages need binNMUs? The
> only reason they would need rebuilt after a glibc bug fix would be if the
> glibc ABI changed in the process, and that would be Very Bad.
>
You are, of cou
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:40:50AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:22:12PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 07:38:36AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > This affects packages that use feholdexcept and
> > > fesetenv, such as uic from QT.
> > It's n
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:22:12PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 07:38:36AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > This affects packages that use feholdexcept and
> > fesetenv, such as uic from QT.
>
> It's not a very long list. I hacked the following short script
> to search a
9 matches
Mail list logo
