Re: [mdz@debian.org: Re: Bug#200028: w3m-img: w3mimgdisplay is setuid root]

2003-11-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:00:28AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:20:17PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > How about it, Anthony; can we dosrcanyway w3m? > > Sounds like #200028 isn't serious (excess permissions isn't in > sarge_rc_policy.txt, so the only reason for it to

Re: [mdz@debian.org: Re: Bug#200028: w3m-img: w3mimgdisplay is setuid root]

2003-11-08 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:20:17PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > How about it, Anthony; can we dosrcanyway w3m? Sounds like #200028 isn't serious (excess permissions isn't in sarge_rc_policy.txt, so the only reason for it to be serious is the maintainer's discretion, which doesn't appear to have b

[mdz@debian.org: Re: Bug#200028: w3m-img: w3mimgdisplay is setuid root]

2003-11-07 Thread Colin Watson
How about it, Anthony; can we dosrcanyway w3m? I think we'll then need to remove stalin from testing in order to get a newer libgc in (due to #216341, although I'll try to remember to talk to a buildd admin about that), but everything else should be OK now. -- Colin Watson