Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: summary of what's blocking security fixes from testing

2005-09-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:16:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:00:05AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Agreed, although I think you might as well let the maintainers of ida > > and motv have a crack at it too. > > So Frank has already NMUed this with a proposed fix for th

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: summary of what's blocking security fixes from testing

2005-09-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:00:05AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Feel free to add urgent hints for any of these. > None of them are that serious holes, IRC. Hmm, if they're not serious enough to bump package urgency for, maybe it's also not useful to have that part of the list posted to d-release.

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: summary of what's blocking security fixes from testing

2005-09-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Andreas Barth wrote: > > > 4:3.3.2-6.2 seems to be in NEW? And is blocking kdegraphics below. > > > > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote (privately): > > > But according to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html it is in > > > t-p-u? And it's not shown in the PTS either? > > > And why would it need to go t

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: summary of what's blocking security fixes from testing

2005-09-14 Thread Andreas Barth
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050914 23:12]: > Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > kdelibs > > > kde transition > > > > 4:3.3.2-6.2 seems to be in NEW? And is blocking kdegraphics below. > > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote (privately): > > But according to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html it is in >

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: summary of what's blocking security fixes from testing

2005-09-14 Thread Matthias Klose
Joey Hess writes: > > > python2.1 > > > alpha build succeeded 2 weeks ago but gone missing > > > mips, mipsel, powerpc builds ditto > > > blocked by gmp > > > python2.2 > > > FTBFS m68k (ICE) > > > FTBFS hppa > > > blocked by gmp > > > > No hope that we can get rid of these yet...? >

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: summary of what's blocking security fixes from testing

2005-09-14 Thread Joey Hess
Steve Langasek wrote: > > bzip > > 8/10 days old > > chmlib > > 3/10 days old > > courier > > too young > > gxine > > too young > > squid > > too young > > sqwebmail > > too young > > Feel free to add urgent hints for any of these. None of them are that serious holes, IRC.

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: summary of what's blocking security fixes from testing

2005-09-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:05:08AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > ntp > > > 177 days old > > > 3 RC bugs, max 98 days old, none with responses from maintainers > > > recommend removal from testing (and/or debian) > > Are these different security bugs than the ones already fixed via >

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: summary of what's blocking security fixes from testing

2005-09-14 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Steve Langasek wrote: > > mozilla-thunderbird > > 41 days old > > FTBFS on alpha, arm, m68k > > ... with a patch in the BTS, if someone wants to NMU... The maintainer posted a followup to the firefox side of the latest Mozilla IDN buffer overflow, so I very much suspect he's currently pre