Hi,
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 18:11 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 04:41:35PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 14:57 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > As discussed last week shortly on IRC, attached is now the debdiff
> > > (only changed chan
Hi Adam
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 04:41:35PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 14:57 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > As discussed last week shortly on IRC, attached is now the debdiff
> > (only changed changelog entry to reflect NMU) for powertop.
> >
> > (I have added wi
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 14:57 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> As discussed last week shortly on IRC, attached is now the debdiff
> (only changed changelog entry to reflect NMU) for powertop.
>
> (I have added win...@debian.org to recipient lists)
>
> Can I upload this?
Please go ahead; thanks
Hi Adam
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 07:31:00PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:42:54PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 17
Hi
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:42:54PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> > > > > Impressive design. What woul
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> > > > Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the "config"?
> > > > I
> > > > agree that not
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> > > Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the "config"? I
> > > agree that not segfaulting is incredibly better than segfaulting, but like
> > > this the
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> > Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the "config"? I
> > agree that not segfaulting is incredibly better than segfaulting, but like
> > this the remaining bunch of lines will be silently ignored?
> I've rewr
Hey,
> Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the "config"? I
> agree that not segfaulting is incredibly better than segfaulting, but like
> this the remaining bunch of lines will be silently ignored?
I've rewritten the patch from Mel Gorman, now you'll get a printf output on
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:59:51AM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I would like to close one important bug in powertop, which affects the usage
> on newer kernels (e.g. 2.6.37), as powertop will segfault on such kernels
> due to too small buffer (see #610101).
>
> Please see my attach
Hey,
I would like to close one important bug in powertop, which affects the usage
on newer kernels (e.g. 2.6.37), as powertop will segfault on such kernels
due to too small buffer (see #610101).
Please see my attached patch for powertop 1.11-1+squeeze1
Greetings
Winnie
diff -u powertop-1.11/de
11 matches
Mail list logo
