Le Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:06:08PM +0200, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I understand your decision for clustalx. I think that there would still be
> > a
> > benefit to have clustalw in main for Squeeze, in particular for the
> > gene
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I understand your decision for clustalx. I think that there would still be a
> benefit to have clustalw in main for Squeeze, in particular for the generation
> of entirely Free Squeeze derivatives for science. While we offer a larg
Le Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:44:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
>
> clustalx: 288 files changed, 57040 insertions(+), 40805 deletions(-)
>
> I think that's far too large a change to be making in stable, even if it
> would move the software out of non-free.
>
> clustalw is a bit better, once
Hi,
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this.
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 18:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> the programs Clustal W and Clustal X have been freed last December and
> eventually made their way in Wheezy. I wonder if it would be possible to make
> them available in Squeeze
Dear Stable release team,
the programs Clustal W and Clustal X have been freed last December and
eventually made their way in Wheezy. I wonder if it would be possible to make
them available in Squeeze, that currently contains the old non-free version.
The relicensing was done at the same time as
5 matches
Mail list logo
