On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 17:21:23 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Have discussed this a bit with Sven on IRC already. The two main
> considerations are: 1) please wait for the python 2.4 transition to complete
> first, 2) please try to check whether this new upstream version includes any
> regressi
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 08:28:09AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:21:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > 2) please try to check whether this new upstream version includes any
> > regressions in the set of architectures supported for native compiling. The
> > latter
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:21:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> 2) please try to check whether this new upstream version includes any
> regressions in the set of architectures supported for native compiling. The
> latter has happened before in the past, and it would be unpleasant to have
> to de
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 02:50:19PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> It looks like we'll have a new ocaml transition soon.
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:31:05PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> >> Get prepared for a new full rebuild!
> > Can you post this to debian-release, i am b
Hi debian-release,
It looks like we'll have a new ocaml transition soon.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:31:05PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
>> Get prepared for a new full rebuild!
>
> Can you post this to debian-release, i am banned from it, and i think it is
5 matches
Mail list logo
