* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060419 18:29]:
> This method of course predates the nice versioning of bugs in the
> BTS. Now that we have versioning, it should be possible to handle
> this automatically, right?
Yes. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/08/msg00050.html
for
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It is unreasonable, I think, for bugs reported only against the
>> experimental version to keep packages out of testing.
>>
>> Other than this one bug, I can't see why gnucash is out of testing, as
>> well, though perhaps I'm misunderstanding somethin
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This bug should have been tagged 'experimental', I guess, and so will
> would have been ignored.
I see; thanks for this.
This method of course predates the nice versioning of bugs in the
BTS. Now that we have versioning, it should be possible to handl
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060419 18:13]:
> On Wed, April 19, 2006 18:09, Julien Danjou wrote:
> >> It is unreasonable, I think, for bugs reported only against the
> >> experimental version to keep packages out of testing.
> >
> > This bug should have been tagged 'experimental', I guess
Le Mer 19 Avril 2006 18:13, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
> On Wed, April 19, 2006 18:09, Julien Danjou wrote:
> >> It is unreasonable, I think, for bugs reported only against the
> >> experimental version to keep packages out of testing.
> >
> > This bug should have been tagged 'experimental', I guess
On Wed, April 19, 2006 18:09, Julien Danjou wrote:
>> It is unreasonable, I think, for bugs reported only against the
>> experimental version to keep packages out of testing.
>
> This bug should have been tagged 'experimental', I guess, and so will
> would have been ignored. I tagged it.
You shoul
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:58:53 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> According to the excuses for testing, one reason gnucash can't go in
> is because it "has release critical bugs". But the only RC bug
> against gnucash is for the version in *experimental* and does not
> apply to the version
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:58:53AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> According to the excuses for testing, one reason gnucash can't go in
> is because it "has release critical bugs". But the only RC bug
> against gnucash is for the version in *experimental* and does not
> apply to the version in
According to the excuses for testing, one reason gnucash can't go in
is because it "has release critical bugs". But the only RC bug
against gnucash is for the version in *experimental* and does not
apply to the version in unstable.
It is unreasonable, I think, for bugs reported only against the
9 matches
Mail list logo
