Dear all,
I have filed #913953 as qbittorrent fails to find the symbols it
seeks. While I do hope that with the eventual rebuild of qbitorrent
using the new boost1.67 headers the bug does go away by itself . All
in all, it has been a smooth affair so far with the only breakage
encountered being qb
at bottom :-
On 02/11/2018, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:26:34 +0100 Dimitri John Ledkov
> wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>
> This transition was ready to be started for j
Dear all,
Probably everybody knows it but still sharing for record -
https://paste.debian.net/1048385
Apparently qtbase5-dev and libqt5webenginecore5 need to be fixed. Also
quassel-client
seems to be affected.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this e
Dear Giovanni,
were you able to get any more insight into the boost rebuilds ?
Would be nice to have a update.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wo
at bottom :-
On 23/09/2018, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would suggest to avoid too much speculation on this point: uploading a
> new release to unstable is alone rather time consuming, because (beside
> the technical challenges of correctly installing dozens of binary
> packages)
Dear all,
Both within and outside Debian there are quite a few packages which
build-depend upon the boost 1.66 and later.
This might be the right time to start so any issues which come up are
fixed and tested in timely manner.
While I'm no developer, I am open to do any sort of usage and testing
Dear all,
I have been looking forward to this transition as quite a few packages
I like/love depend upon the boost transition happening. Can anybody
share some sort of timeline as to when can we expect the transition to
start ?
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My
Dear all,
I had shared the below at debian-publicity in response to the stretch
announcement in which I was given this answer -
https://lists.debian.org/debian-publicity/2017/06/msg00012.html
Now as I'm not a DD (nor hopeful of becoming a non-uploading DD at
least for sometime) hence debian-deve
Hi all,
While the Stable Release Managers (SRM's) would have the last laugh, I
do think it would be nice if we can get 1.8.1 release in Debian. From
the debdiff shared it seems only 8 lines of working code are changed
excluding comments and the changelog. I don't know python so can't
help there.
I
at bottom :-
On 11/4/13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 14:04 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> we'd like to upload the last bits of GNOME 3.8
>> This involves a library transition for gnome-desktop:
>> libgnome-desktop-3-2 → libgnome-desktop-3-7
>> and mutter:
>> libmutter0 → libmut
On 10/17/13, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> at bottom :-
>
> On 10/17/13, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> shirish शिरीष (2013-10-16):
>>> Hi Cyril,
>>>
>>> should I upload qbittorrent to unstable then? " - Cristian Greco
>>>
>>> Please share/t
at bottom :-
On 10/17/13, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> shirish शिरीष (2013-10-16):
>> Hi Cyril,
>>
>> should I upload qbittorrent to unstable then? " - Cristian Greco
>>
>> Please share/tell what you think.
>
> I think that your telling me what to do is s
Dear Cyril,
A user here. Cristian asked if he can upload qbittorrent to unstable
(3.0.9) version.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/10/msg00441.html
"
Hi Cyril,
should I upload qbittorrent to unstable then? " - Cristian Greco
Please share/tell what you think.
The thing is there is n
Hi all,
It was nice to see updates happening on this transition but some
packages are still to go through (it seems).
I did the updates and only one of the obsolete packages have some
dependencies which have not been updated to newer versions of library.
$ alias apto
alias apto='aptitude search ~
Hi all,
I don't know much but have been following the libav9 transition. For
the openscenegraph talk shouldn't there have been the mail CC'ing the
maintainer as well. At the very least, this discussion needed to be
shared with him and I have cc'ed him in this mail.
Looking forward to a successful
Hi all,
Please CC me if somebody responds as I'm not subscribed to the list/s.
Does anybody have/know of a roadmap to getting the latest syslinux
perhaps the one which is now in experimental to testing ? This is with
reference to the UEFI issues which people have been facing while
installing Debia
Hi all,
Please CC me if somebody responds as I'm not subscribed to the list/s.
Does anybody have/know of a roadmap to getting the latest syslinux
perhaps the one which is now in experimental to testing ? This is with
reference to the UEFI issues which people have been facing while
installing Debia
Hi all,
Any update on getting the three packages from experimental to unstable.
I am guessing these are the experimental versions which need to come
down to sid/unstable.
$ apt-cache policy libopencv-core2.4
libopencv-core2.4:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2.4.6.1+dfsg-0exp1
Version table:
Hi all,
With the planned transition of libav9 i.e. #706798 would the security
holes be fixed as well ?
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
in-line :-
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi Shirish,
Hi Steven,
> On 24/05/12 12:20, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>> http://snapshot.debian.org/pool/main/k/kdepimlibs/libkabc4_4.7.4-2+b1_amd64.deb
>> 2012-05-24 22:12:28 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>
>
addition :-
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Please lemme know how I can help in furthering the investigation about
> not resuming the download.
I tried again and was again hit by the same thing again and again .
10:33:45 shirish@deb-home:
~/jigdo_7.01a1/debian-
In-line :-
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>
>> $ wget -c
>> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120516T040426Z/pool/main/0/0ad/0ad-dbg_0%7Er11339-2_amd64.deb
>> --2012-05-16 12:09:40--
>&
at bottom :-
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On 16.05.2012 04:06, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 00:30 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>>>
in-line :-
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 00:30 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:55 PM, shirish शिरीष
>> wrote:
>> This is the latest effort with another mirror, as c
in-line :-
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:55 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> I have tried with both http:// omfpr,atopm
meant to say had tried both http://http.debian.org as well as
ftp://ftp.debian.org but somehow get stuck somewhere.
This is the latest effort with another mirror, as can be seen a
Hi all,
I have been trying to use jigdo to download DVD 1 and keep getting
stuck at one file in the download.
In fact the download on this isn't smooth in anyway . Here's what I
get when I try to download it via jigdo :-
100 files not found in previous pass, trying
alternative download locations:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi all,
As a user curious about transition I find it hard to find information
about why a particular transition happens.
http://release.debian.org/transitions/ . While
release.debian.org/transitions jus
27 matches
Mail list logo
