Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1065309
Hello.
For some reason, some rebuilds succeeded without a +b1 version.
Their reverse dependencies is dep-waiting on the +b1 version.
Please cancel three dep-wait restrictions.
gb libgnatcoll-db_23.0.0-6 . armel powerpc . -o
gb libgnatc
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1065309
Hello.
The time_t64 transition has triggered #1067453 in the Ada compiler,
which is now fixed by gcc-13/13.2.0-24.
The patch modifies the sources of the Ada standard library, so most
Ada packages need a rebuild in order to update their depen
Hello.
Version 2 seems OK.
Thanks.
Hello.
A bug affects the Ada tests during the build of the gcc-12 source
package.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066052
Such error messages happen on each (uncoordinated) change in the sources
of an Ada library. Some sources for the standard library built by GCC
are gen
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hello.
In addition to the information in https://bugs.debian.org/1065309,
here is the usual summary preparing a gnat transition.
--
This bug requests a green light for a transition of Ada packages from
gnat-12 to gnat-13 in un
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: libgnatc...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libgnatcoll
Hello.
This follows the NMU requested at
https://bugs.debian.org/1055063
nmu: gprbuild_2024.1.20231009
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: gprbu...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:gprbuild
Hello.
The gprbuild source package builds the libgnatprj-dev binary package.
Libgnatprj-dev Depends: on
gnat-1
gency=medium
+
+ * Break/Replace libadacgi*-dev since oldstable. Closes: #1034975.
+
+ -- Nicolas Boulenguez Wed, 10 May 2023 21:26:50 +0200
+
adacgi (1.6-31) unstable; urgency=medium
* Reupload to unstable for the gnat-12 transition.
diff -Nru adacgi-1.6/debian/control adacgi-1.6/debian/control
--
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1026392
libgmpada
I have disabled the post-build tests on i386. Not proud of this
work-around, but #1026828 does not deserve an RC severity.
whitakers-words
is fixed by an NMU and should migrate to testing within days.
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1026392
X-Debbugs-Cc: Calum McConnell , Andreas Bombe
Hello.
Here are the remaining blockers as far as I understand
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-12.html.
libxmlada (orange line):
I fail to understand the problem.
libgmpada (re
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1026392
Libgnatcoll-db/23.0.0-2 in experimental builds on mipsel.
Libgmpada has failed on two different i386 buildds but succeeded on
the i386 porterbox. Bug #1026828 will prevent migration to testing.
As far as I know, we can start the reupload to
> libgnatcoll-db succesfully built on mipsel in the meantime.
Yes, I have uploaded a fixed version.
> > - are removed from testing because of #1020018,
> > - are updated in experimental, but now
> > fail to build on a supported architecture.
> > I intend to
> > - fill RC bugs against them in or
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello.
The gcc-V source package builds the Ada compiler (gnat-V) and
companion library (libgnat-V).
The default Ada compiler is selected by the gnat package.
In unstable and testing, gna
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1010468
Hello.
As far as I understand, the gnat-11 transition is complete and this
bug can be closed.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello.
The gcc-V source package builds the Ada compiler (gnat-V) and
companion library (libgnat-V).
The default Ada compiler is selected by the gnat package.
In unstable and testing, gna
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello.
The gcc-$V source package builds the Ada compiler (gnat-$V) and
companion libraries (libgnat-$V and libgnat_util-$V).
The default Ada compiler is selected by the gnat package.
In
Please ignore the two 'nw' lines and use 'nmu' instead.
nmu music123_16.4-4 .ANY . -m 'gnat (>= 9)'
nmutopal_80-1 .ANY . -m 'gnat (>= 9)'
The paragraph explaining why ghdl is not affected also applies to
gcc-8, gcc-9 and so on.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello.
The gcc-$BV source package builds an Ada compiler named gnat-$BV,
and the companion libraries (libgnat-$BV, libgnatvsn$BV).
In unstable, gnat-8 and gnat-9 coexist.
The default Ad
With the attachment.
gpr-graph.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello.
As reported in #945197, the grpc and gprbuild source packages both
build libgpr.so. In order to fix the conflict, version 2018-7 of the
libgpr2-dev binary package renames libgpr.so to
.
unblock libxmlada/18-4
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libxmlada (18-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Update to unicode version 12. Closes: #927943.
+
+ -- Nicolas Boulenguez Thu, 02 May 2019 11:47:15 +0200
+
libxmlada (18-3) unstable; urgency=medium
g 2019-01-13 12:12:45.0 +0100
+++ adacontrol-1.20r7/debian/changelog 2019-04-11 10:45:47.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+adacontrol (1.20r7-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Ignore tests, but let them produce a log as suggested in #926747.
+
+ -- Nicolas Boulenguez Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:45:47 +0
20r7-2
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+adacontrol (1.20r7-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Disable tests, lowering the severity of #924835.
+
+ -- Nicolas Boulenguez Thu, 04 Apr 2019 21:13:55 +0200
+
adacontrol (1.20r7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream r
Hello.
According to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-8.html,
the transition is almost completed.
polyorb and spark are orphaned and removed from testing.
Other gcc versions should probably be exceptions, allowed to build
with gcc-7 until it is fully removed.
What should we do to
Hello.
There was a bug in gprbuild/2018-2 causing reverse dependencies to
FTBFS on many architectures. The last affected package is
* anet on mipsel (Build-Attempted).
gprbuild/2018-3 fixed them, but broke 386 architectures.
* libgnatcoll on i386 (Build-Attempted).
* libgnatcoll on hurd-i386 (Fai
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> What should happen with plplot and ghdl? Do they need to be binNMUed?
I had completely missed these two source packages.
At first glance, a simple NMU should be sufficient for plplot. The
part building an Ada library is already not conformant with the Ada
policy, so an N
Hello.
During the gnat-8 transition [1], the libxmlada source package has
introduced new binary packages in experimental:
- Shared Object versions (libxmlada-*5)
- Ada Library Information (libxmlada-*8-dev)
These binary versions have never been seen in unstable.
All packages seem ready, I have re
Thanks for the explanations.
> We can't move (or binNMU) a package from experimental to unstable. So you'll
> need to do uploads in those cases.
All packages from experimental have been reuploaded to unstable.
> For the two packages that are ready in unstable (music123 and
> ada-reference-manual
The naive question at the end of the request was sincere.
What should I do exactly?
Should I rebuild and reupload each package manually?
Or prepare lines like:
nmu adabrowse_4.0.3-9 . ANY . -m 'Reupload to unstable to complete the gnat-8
transition.'
dw music123_16.4-3 . ANY . -m 'gnat (>=
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello.
Ada packages Build-Depend: gnat, a virtual package Depending on the
default compiler.
In unstable, gnat/7.1 Depends: gnat-7.
In experimental, gnat/8.0.0 Depends: gnat-8.
In
Hello.
The packages in the list below are either Ada libraries (producing
versioned runtime and -dev), or packages depending on such a library.
They have been updated and recompiled with gcc-7 in unstable.
There is no circular dependency.
"anet" fails on some release architectures, but there is no
testing.
--- libncursesada-6.0.20150808/debian/changelog
+++ libncursesada-6.0.20150808/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libncursesada (6.0.20150808-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Adrian Bunk ]
+ * Build with latest dpkg requires PIE hardening flags. Closes: #844918.
+
+ -- Nicolas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello.
Every package containing an Ada library embeds checksums of its
recursive dependencies, in files suffixed with .ali. Everytime
something attempts to build against the library, gcc che
debian/tmp/*.
- update descriptions: control, gprbuild.1, README.source, README.Debian.
- re-enable some source lintian checks related to GFDL.
* gprbuild-doc.TODO: postpone unrelated changes for after the freeze.
-- Nicolas Boulenguez Sat, 08 Nov 2014 12:15:55 +0100
gprbuild (2014-5
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello.
A bug in the gnat-4.9 compiler broke some packages Build-Depending on
it. It is now closed by 4.9.1-2, and they should build fine.
nmu apq_3.2.0-2 libaunit_3.7.1-1 music123_16.3-6+
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu music123_16.3-6 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new gnat, dropping indirect
dependency on gnat-4.6."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:50:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > e2fsprogs (1.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
> >* Non-maintainer upload.
> This shouldn't have been uploaded to unstable without first getting
> permission from the Debian Release team (and preferably me --- it
> would have bee
The complete description that you provide confirms that your changes
will most probably not reach wheezy, as they are not compliant with
the current freeze policy [1].
#688558 has a severity of normal. The worst other patched bug (ever
growing config file) seems a normal bug to me [2].
[1] http:/
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libfm.
This patch introduces a work-around for #593607: in some
circumstances, source files were deleted even in case of failure.
Upstream 1.1.0 brings a true fix fo
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:29:30AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 27.12.2012 00:47, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> > bash (4.2-4wheezy0.1) testing; urgency=low
> > .
> > * Non-maintainer upload.
> > * debian/bash.preinst-lib.c: pass F_[GS]ETFD, not F_[GS]ETFL,
40 matches
Mail list logo
