; only in volatile. Which more or less is the situation we have today.
Mmmmk, then forget what i've said. It indeed doesn't make much sense
anymore.
> To me, the approach of moving clamav + all its rdepends to volatile really
> looks
> like the only option.
Yeah, I agree.
s. These should preferably go to
volatile.
The second group contains all the rest, which is basically GUIs, offline
file system scanners, and the like. Leaving these under stable is
probably fair enough.
Just my 2 eurocents,
-acab
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2 matches
Mail list logo
